The petitioner's application was withdrawn by counsel, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~82
AMAN SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Daniyal Khan, Advocate (M:9819600925)
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS
..... Respondents Through: Ms. Tajinder Virdi, Standing Counsel for MCD, Mob: 9818834444 Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Mr. Vivek Kr. Singh, Mr. Naved Ahmed, Mr. Shubham Kumar, Advocates for GNCTD Mr. Cheitanya Madan, Ms. Srishti Banerjee, Advocates (M:8588939380)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 16.04.2024
CM APPL. 22150/2024
th 1. In view of the order passed on 15 April, 2024, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the present application.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
APRIL 16, 2024
au
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2024 at 12:09:06
Aman Singh
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Others
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
