Petitioner stated the second motion petition had already been filed and allowed, rendering the contempt petition infructuous. The court disposed of the petition as having been satisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~63
PANKAJ DUGGAL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Dalal, Advocates. (M): 8010437372 Email: [email protected]
versus
ASTHA CHAWLA ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. J.K. Bhola with Mr. Mohit Mittal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 04.04.2024
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
APRIL 4, 2024 c
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2024 at 11:52:43
Pankaj Duggal
Astha Chawla
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
