Disposed

Smt Tripta Chhabra v. Mrs Aradhana Gautam Tyagi

Delhi HC5 Apr 2024CONT.CAS(C)/567/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a prior writ order directing DDA to consider the petitioner's representation. A speaking order dated 07.03.2024 rejecting the representation was produced; the court noted the directions stood complied with and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Delay in refiling condoned; petition disposed with liberty to petitioner to challenge the Speaking Order dated 07.03.2024 under law.

Smt Tripta Chhabra Vs Mrs Aradhana Gautam Tyagi — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~86

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 567/2024 & CM APPL. 20360/2024

¶4

SMT TRIPTA CHHABRA ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: None.

¶6

versus

¶7

MRS ARADHANA GAUTAM TYAGI ..... Respondent

¶8

Through: Mr. Sanjay Katyal, SC, DDA with Mr. Nihal Singh, Advocate for respondent/DDA. (M): 8920345880 Email: [email protected]

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶11

O R D E R % 05.04.2024

¶12

CM APPL. 20360/2024

¶13

The present is an application to condone the delay of 60 days in refiling the present petition.

¶14

Considering the submissions made in the present application, delay is condoned and application is disposed of.

¶15

CONT.CAS(C) 567/2024

¶16

The present contempt petition has been filed alleging willful th disobedience of the order dated 09 November, 2023 passed in W .P. (C) No. 14670/2023 .

¶17

By way of the aforesaid order, directions had been issued to the respondent to consider the writ petition of the petitioner as a detailed

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 04:20:39

¶20

representation. Further, directions had been issued to the respondent/Delhi Development Authority (“DDA”) to dispose of the detailed representation of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. Since, the said representation was not decided, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶21

Issue notice.

¶22

Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent/DDA.

¶23

Learned counsel has handed over a copy of the Speaking Order dated 07^th March, 2024 issued by Lease Administration Branch (Rohini), DDA. The same is taken on record

¶24

By way of the said Speaking Order, the representation of the petitioner has been rejected by the respondent/DDA.

¶25

Accordingly, this Court notes that the directions as passed in the order dated 09^th April, 2023, stand complied with.

¶26

In case, the petitioner has any grievance against the Speaking Order th

¶27

dated 07 March, 2024 passed by the respondent/DDA, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law.

¶28

With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of.

¶29

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶30

APRIL 5, 2024 c

¶31

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 04:20:39

Smt Tripta Chhabra v. Mrs Aradhana Gautam Tyagi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Tripta Chhabra v. Mrs Aradhana Gautam Tyagi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bejon Kumar Misra Vs Vijay Kumar Dev & Anr.

Titaanium Ten Enterprise Limited Vs Union of India & Anr.

Sandeep Kumar Sharma Vs Poonam Sharma

Pankaj Duggal Vs Astha Chawla

Sunil Vs Pinki Rani

Rajiv Kohli Vs Shri Radha Krishan Director Estate 1 Department

Nagar Nigam Sewa Nivrit Karmchari Kalyan Samiti and Ors. Vs Gyanesh Bharti

Sh. Mumtaz Saifi Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Titaanium Ten Enterprise Limited Vs Union of India & Anr.

Sandeep Kumar Sharma Vs Poonam Sharma

Pankaj Duggal Vs Astha Chawla

Gurucharan Singh Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Deepak Goel Vs Dolly Gupta

Jitender Vs Jaya Verma Sinha Chairman Northern Railways