A contempt case was disposed of as infructuous after the petitioner, citing subsequent developments and filing of consequent contempt cases, submitted that the matter no longer required adjudication.
Contempt case CONT.CAS(C) 1138/2016 disposed of as infructuous at petitioner's request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
Through: Mr.Rohit Sharma, Mr.Atul Agarwal, Mr.Mayank Seth, MrNikhil, Mr.Jatin, Ms.Sushalini, Ms.Deepanshi Dahiya and Ms.Archana Jain, Advocates.
versus
RAJINDER KUMAR JAIN & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sarwar Raza, Mr.Muhammad Zaid, Mr.Nabil Raza, Mr.Mohd. Waseem, Ms.Shreya Kumar & Mr.S.Ahmed, Advocates for R-4 & 5.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R
% 14.10.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
OCTOBER 14, 2024 Nc /dp
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:42:24
Nirmal Kumari Jain
Rajinder Kumar Jain
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
