This is a one-line dismissal order where the High Court held that the appeal had become infructuous because the warrant of possession of the suit property was already executed, and dismissed the appeal accordingly.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous due to execution of warrant of possession.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
MOHD AYUB ANSARI .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Surendra Yadav, Advocate.
versus
VINAY GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Respondent in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 14.10.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
OCTOBER 14, 2024 Nc /dp
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:50:29
MOHD AYUB ANSARI
VINAY GUPTA
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
