Amrit Pal Kaur & Ors. v. Harcharan Singh Josh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi corrected a typographical error in a previous order, directing that the mention of Civil Suit No. 65/2016 should be read as Civil Suit No. 65/2013, and discharged the office note.
What did the court decide?
Civil Suit No. 65/2016 to be read as Civil Suit No. 65/2013; office note discharged.