Petitioner defending a commercial suit challenged the cost of Rs.49,500 imposed for delay in re-filing his written statement. With the plaintiff's counsel conceding, the court reduced the cost to Rs.30,000, split equally between the plaintiff and the Advocates' Welfare Fund, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~93
.....Petitioner
versus
SHIV KUMAR GANDHI
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Kumar and Ms. Dolly Rani, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
CM(M) 3362/2024 1
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 0.09.2024 15:01:41
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024/ss
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 3362/2024 2
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 0.09.2024 15:01:41
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the cost of Rs.49,500/- imposed for delayed re-filing of the written statement should be reduced.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pranay Jain
Shiv Kumar Gandhi
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
