Disposed

Shri Sanatan Dharam Mandir Trust (Regd.) v. Rishi Walia

Delhi HC3 Sept 2024CM(M)/3312/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order records that the petitioner did not press the eviction-related execution petition challenging a settlement order due to alleged fraud. It was disposed as withdrawn, reserving rights to seek recall and revival prayers from the executing court.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed as withdrawn; petitioner granted liberty to approach executing court for recall and revival of execution petition.

Shri Sanatan Dharam Mandir Trust (Regd.) Vs Rishi Walia — Execution and Attachment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~71

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of decision^: 03^rd September, 2024

¶4

- CM(M) 3312/2024 & CM APPL. 50844-50845/2024

¶5

SHRI SANATAN DHARAM MANDIR TRUST (REGD.)

¶6

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Maitri with Ms.Radhika Chandralekha, Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

RISHI WALIA .....Respondent Through: None

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)

¶10

Petitioner Trust had filed an eviction petition with respect to the one shop and eviction order was passed by the learned Rent Controller on 30.09.2013.

¶11

Pursuant thereto, an execution petition was filed by the Trust/Decree Holder which was registered as Ex.Civil 507/2022.

¶12

It was being pursued by the Trust when on 12.05.2023, a new counsel, appeared from the side of the Decree Holder and one application was also submitted under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Such application was allowed whereby one Mr. Ravi Bajaj, stated to be the General Secretary of the Decree Holder Trust, was impleaded as party. On 05.01.2024, an application was moved seeking preponement in the date of hearing and said Sh. Bajaj made a statement before the

¶13

Signature Not Verified

¶14

CM(M) 3312/2024

¶15

¶16

Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 4.09.2024 14:52:43

¶17

learned Executing Court that the matter had been amicably compromised and he may be permitted to withdraw the same.

¶18

Resultantly, the execution petition was disposed as settled/satisfied.

¶19

Said order has been challenged by the Decree Holder Trust on the ground that a fraud has been played upon the Court as such Sh. Ravi Bajaj was neither General Secretary of the Trust nor was even authorized to pursue the execution in question on behalf of the Trust.

¶20

It is also contended that the Decree Holder Trust had never authorized any counsel with the name of Sh. Sanjay Barolia and, therefore, apparently, it seems to be a case where on account of some collusion between the parties i.e. said Sh. Bajaj and the Judgment Debtor, a false statement has been made to defeat the rights and interest of the Decree Holder.

¶21

Evidently, the allegations are quite grave and serious in nature but fact remains that it is not clear as to why the Decree Holder Trust did not move any application before the learned Executing Court itself seeking recall of the abovesaid order and to revive the execution petition.

¶22

After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not press the present petition. He, however, seeks liberty to file appropriate application before the

¶23

Signature Not Verified

¶24

CM(M) 3312/2024

¶25

¶26

Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 4.09.2024 14:52:43

¶27

learned Executing Court seeking recall of the abovesaid order and to revive the execution petition.

¶28

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn while reserving all the rights and contentions of the parties. The petitioner would be at liberty to move appropriate application seeking recall of the abovesaid order and seeking revival of its execution petition and learned Executing Court would consider the same, hear all concerned and dispose that of in accordance with law.

¶29

(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE

¶30

SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 st

¶31

Signature Not Verified

¶32

Digitally Signed CM(M) 3312/2024 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 4.09.2024 14:52:43

¶33

Shri Sanatan Dharam Mandir Trust (Regd.) v. Rishi Walia

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Sanatan Dharam Mandir Trust (Regd.) v. Rishi Walia

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sardar Balwinder Singh Vs Umed Singh

M/S Parsvnath Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Kedar Nath Gupta and Sons (Huf)

Rajat Chiller Vs Abhishek Rana

Smc Nova Estate Private Limited Vs Surya Marketing Company

Abhilasha Chauhan Vs Ankur Rajput

Meena Devi Vs Beena Rani

M/S. Unishire Homes LLP Vs Sriganesh Chandrasekaran and Others

Shri Aggarwal Bhawan Trust (Regd) Vs Mange Ram Gupta

Sardar Balwinder Singh Vs Umed Singh

M/S Parsvnath Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Kedar Nath Gupta and Sons (Huf)

Rajat Chiller Vs Abhishek Rana

Joginder Kumar (Since Deceased) through Lrs and Ors. Vs Krishan Pal Singh

Mohit Virmani Vs Chander Dev Chawla & Anr.

M/S Narain Service Station Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.