Petition under Article 227 challenging an NCDRC order; respondents had already challenged the same order by appeal pending in the Supreme Court. Court declined to entertain the petition and disposed of it, leaving petitioner free to file a petition before the Supreme Court to be tagged with the pending appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~86
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashutosh, Advocate.
versus
SRIGANESH CHANDRASEKARAN AND OTHERS
.....Respondents Through: Mr. C. Bhattacharyya, Advocate for R-1 to 10.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
CM(M) 2841/2024 1
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 5.09.2024 14:56:14
therefore, he may be permitted to continue with the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 4, 2024/ss
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 2841/2024 2
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 5.09.2024 14:56:14
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition under Article 227 challenging an NCDRC order is entertainable when the same order has already been challenged by an appeal filed before the Supreme Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S. UNISHIRE HOMES LLP
SRIGANESH CHANDRASEKARAN AND OTHERS
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
