Smc Nova Estate Private Limited v. Surya Marketing Company
Delhi HCCM(M)/3290/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court noted a registry objection that the trademark/copyright petition should have been registered under the IPD roster and listed the matter before the Roster Bench on 03.09.2024.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~99
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CM(M) 3290/2024 & CM APPL. 50288/2024
¶4
- SMC NOVA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED
¶5
.....Petitioner
¶6
Through: Mr. Satish Kumar and Mr. Rakesh Tiwari, Advocates.
¶7
versus
¶8
SURYA MARKETING COMPANY
¶9
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Bhatia with Ms. Gurusharan Kaur, Advocates.
¶10
CORAM:
¶11
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
¶12
O R D E R % 02.09.2024
¶13
- Petitioner is defending the petition seeking injunction and direction to him for infringement/passing off trademark/copyright etc.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
SMC Nova Estate Private Limited
- respondent
Surya Marketing Company
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court