A revision petition challenged a Trial Court order recording evidence via a Local Commissioner. The High Court, noting the petitioner's financial handicap, directed the Trial Court to record evidence itself.
Petition disposed with direction to plaintiff to appear before Trial Court for recording of evidence by the Trial Court itself.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
SUNNY SHARMA
.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Geeta Verma and Mr. Riyaan Bhola, Advocates.
versus
RITIKA SHARMA AND ANR
.....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
J U D G M E N T (oral)
CM(M) 327/2023 1
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 3.08.2024 17:31:42
huge expenditure on his pocket. It is, therefore, prayed that the learned Trial Court may rather record the evidence itself instead of referring them to a Local Commissioner.
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
AUGUST 12, 2024/ sw
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 327/2023 2
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 3.08.2024 17:31:42
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Trial Court to record evidence personally given the petitioner's financial inability to bear Local Commissioner fees.
Sunny Sharma
Ritika Sharma and ANR
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
