The petitioner withdrew the petition stating he had moved an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC before the Trial Court. The Court dismissed the petition as not pressed, reserving all rights and contentions of the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
SAURABH JAIN & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Laxmi Goel and Mr. Surender Sharma and Mr. Shubham Atresh, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 09.08.2024
MANOJ JAIN, J
AUGUST 9, 2024/ss
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:29:15
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SONU JAIN
SAURABH JAIN
ANR.
MANOJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
