Insurer sought Article 227 review of an NCDRC revision order in a consumer dispute. Relying on Supreme Court precedent, counsel sought withdrawal to approach the jurisdictional Andhra Pradesh High Court; petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
INDIA FIRST LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rohit Rattu, Advocate
versus
KORADA KASULAMMA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
J U D G M E N T (oral)
CM(M) 2664/2024 1
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 4.08.2024 15:29:57
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
AUGUST 13, 2024/ dr
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 2664/2024 2
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 4.08.2024 15:29:57
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Delhi High Court has jurisdiction over a petition under Article 227 challenging an NCDRC order when the cause of action arose in Andhra Pradesh.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Siddhartha S Mookerjee vs. Madhab Chand MitterRelied on¶3
Siddhartha S Mookerjee vs. Madhab Chand Mitter, Civil Appeal Nos. 3915-16/2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
India First Life Insurance Co. Ltd
Korada Kasulamma
Anr (second respondent)
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
