The petitioner challenged an order refusing permission to place documents on record and bring additional evidence. The High Court dismissed the petition, citing laches and the advanced stage of the trial, declining to interfere with the Trial Court's discretion under Article 227.
Petition stands dismissed; no intervention under Article 227 of the Constitution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~82
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Udayan Jain with Mr. Amit Sherawat, Mr. Ranjan Mishra and Mr. Raj Surana, Advocates.
versus
.....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
CM(M) 3336/2024 1
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 6.09.2024 16:16:21
CM(M) 3336/2024 2
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 6.09.2024 16:16:21
Based on inferences that are impermissible in law. Reference be made to Puri Investments Versus Young Friends and Co. and Others: 2022 SCC OnLine SC 283.
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024/ sw
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 3336/2024 3
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 6.09.2024 16:16:21
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the refusal to admit late evidence under Article 227 CPC when the case is at the stage of final arguments due to laches.
Whether the supervisory court can correct the trial court's judgment where the denial of additional evidence is based on reasonable grounds of delay.
Whether there is any perversity in the impugned order rejecting the application to place documents on record.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Puri Investments Versus Young Friends and Co. and OthersReferred¶21
Puri Investments Versus Young Friends and Co. and Others: 2022 SCC OnLine SC 283 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dileep Singh
Girija Devi
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
