The Single Judge allowed the petitioner to place specific documents on record that were previously declined, as the respondents had no objection and no delay would result.
Petition allowed to place documents on record; Trial Court to proceed. Cross appeal dismissed. Next hearing date cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Through: Mr. Umang Tyagi with Ms.Aditi Kapoor, Advocates.
versus
SHASHI BAJAJ & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Roshan Santhalia, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
J U D G M E N T (oral)
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 2551/2024
1
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 9.07.2024 15:11:43
Agreement dated 07.03.2015 executed at 6:51 pm and copy of MCD property tax receipt dated 02.06.2018.
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
JULY 18, 2024 st
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 2551/2024 Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 9.07.2024 15:11:43
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow a writ petition allowing the petitioner to place additional documents on record despite previous dismissal.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vanita Bathla
Shashi Bajaj
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
