Sonia Venugopal & Anr. v. Taani Kapoor
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the maintainability of an eviction petition filed by a widow under Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, dismissing it as not pressed by the tenant petitioners who sought withdrawal.
What did the court decide?
The petition was dismissed as not pressed; petitioners were given liberty to withdraw it.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CM(M) 2949/2024 & CM APPL. 40243/2024
- SONIA VENUGOPAL & ANR.
.....Petitioner
- Through: Mr. Kartikeya Rastogi, Advocate.
versus
TAANI KAPOOR
.....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
- O R D E R
- % 19.07.2024 CM APPL. 40244/2024 (Exemption)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should intervene in a pending eviction petition filed under Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act when the grounds for invocation are disputed.
Whether premises can be evicted under Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act when not let out by the husband of the owner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sonia Venugopal & Anr.
- respondent
Taani Kapoor
Coram
Manoj Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court