Petitioner sought expeditious disposal of a 2019 suit; counsel did not press the revision petition. The High Court dismissed it as not pressed and requested the Trial Court to conclude the trial within six months, reserving all rights and contentions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
NAND KISHORE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Satyarthi, Ms. Amita Satyarthi, Mr. Amitanshu Satyarthi, Ms. Sunita Sharma, Mr. Suresh and Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocates along with petitioner in person.
RAJ KAUR .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Khan, Ms. Soniya Arya and Mr. Avdhesh Saraswat, Advocates
CORAM:
% 16.07.2024
CM(M) 176/2023 1
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/07/2024 at 14:11:14
MANOJ JAIN, J
JULY 16, 2024/ dr
CM(M) 176/2023 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/07/2024 at 14:11:14
Nand Kishore
Raj Kaur
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
