Petitioners sought withdrawal of the petition citing the respondent's death and an amicable settlement reached under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The High Court accepted these submissions and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
ANURAG GOSAIN AND ANR. & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Petitioners in person.
versus
S.D. CHUGH .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:37:03
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
DECEMBER 5, 2024/ vp
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:37:03
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition can be allowed to be withdrawn upon settlement and death of the respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anurag Gosain & Ors.
S.D. Chugh
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
