Petition challenged the District Judge's order reopening cross-examination of PW-1 in an Order XXXVII recovery suit despite repeated closures. With petitioner's counsel conceding one further opportunity, the High Court disposed of the petition, directing completion of cross-examination on the next date with imposed costs and no adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
SURESH KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.P.Luthra, Mr. Himanshu Luthra and Mr. Pulkit Luthra, Advs.
versus
AKHILESH SINGH .....Respondent Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 06.12.2024 CM APPL. 71500/2024 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 3998/2024& CM APPL. 71501/2024 (stay)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/12/2024 at 10:55:13
order.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
DECEMBER 6, 2024/ib
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/12/2024 at 10:55:13
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent should be granted a further opportunity to cross-examine PW-1 in the pending recovery suit under Order XXXVII CPC?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Suresh Kumar
Akhilesh Singh
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
