Petition for stay was dismissed as withdrawn because the trial court had already passed judgment, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
M/S ACE FURNITURE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Harsh Agarwal, Adv.
versus
M/S HILIFE FURNITURE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
DECEMBER 3, 2024
RM
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:09:54
M/S ACE FURNITURE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.
M/S HILIFE FURNITURE PRIVATE LIMITED
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
