Allowed

Surya Kant v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Delhi HC7 Mar 2024BAIL APPLN./378/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge bail order granting regular bail to petitioner following complainant's and prosecution's non-objection based on an affidavit denying title in disputed property, subject to personal and surety bonds and standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail subject to furnishing Personal Bond of Rs. 20,000 and Surety Bond of like amount, and complying with conditions regarding appearance, mobile contact, and non-contact with w

Surya Kant Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~19

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 378/2024 SURYA KANT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi with Mr. Ashish Khatri & Mr. Deepak Khatri, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with Insp. Sandeep Malik SI Prem Kumar PS Maidan Garhi Mr. Shivek Trehan, Ms. Rishika Goyal and Ms. Riya Nair, Advs. for complainant

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 07.03.2024

¶8

The present application has been filed seeking regular bail in connection with FIR No.85/2023 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B/34 IPC registered at Police Station Maidan Garhi.

¶9

Pursuant to the directions given by this Court vide order dated 28.02.2024, the petitioner has been produced from jail.

¶10

An affidavit has been signed and filed by the petitioner to the effect that he does not have any title or right in the disputed property. The affidavit is taken on record.

¶11

In view of the fact that above affidavit has been filed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, submits that he has no objection in case the petitioner is enlarged on bail.

¶12

The learned APP for the State submits that since the complainant is satisfied and has no objection with regard to the grant of bail to the petitioner,

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2024 at 11:17:03

¶14

the State also has no objection in case the petitioner is enlarged on bail.

¶15

In view of the above, the petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to his furnishing a Personal Bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- and one Surety Bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate, further subject to the following conditions:-

¶16

a) Petitioner shall appear before the Court as and when the matter is taken up for hearing.

¶17

b) Petitioner shall provide mobile number to the IO concerned which shall be kept in working condition at all times and he shall not change the mobile number without prior intimation to the Investigating Officer concerned.

¶18

c) Petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not communicate with or come in contact with the witnesses.

¶19

The petition stands disposed of.

¶20

It is made clear that nothing stated above is to be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

¶21

Copy of the order be forwarded to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary compliance and information.

¶22

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

¶23

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶24

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶25

MARCH 7, 2024 N.S. ASWAL

¶26

Surya Kant v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surya Kant v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaurav Gupta Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Honey Yadav Vs the State

Farid Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Manoj Vs State NCT of Delhi

Immamuddin @ Babu Khatri Vs State NCT of Delhi

Suparana Sethi Vs the State (Govt. of Nct)