Dismissed
Honey Yadav v. the State
Delhi HCBAIL APPLN./830/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application after recording of eye witness evidence.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~11
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- BAIL APPLN. 830/2023
¶4
HONEY YADAV ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Ompal Singh and Mr. Geet Kumar, Advs.
¶6
versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for State with Insp. Ashok Kumar, PS Special Branch and Insp. Prashant Yadav, PS. DIU/Rohini.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 06.03.2024
¶8
- The learned APP for the State submits that the charge has been framed and the matter is now listed for recording of the prosecution evidence.
¶9
- He further submits that there are three eye witnesses in the matter namely Chintesh @ Chinu, Rahul and Manpreet Rana.
¶10
- He urges the Court that the bail application of the petitioner may be considered after the statement of the eye witnesses have been recorded for which purpose the date fixed before the learned Trial Court is 15.05.2024.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether bail application should be considered after recording of eye witness statements?
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Honey Yadav
- respondent
The State
Coram
AI extract
Vikas Mahajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court