Dismissed

Jatinder Singh v. the State Govt of NCT Delhi

Delhi HC6 Sept 2024BAIL APPLN./3240/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi disposed of an application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner sought bail in a theft case where a co-accused allegedly handed over a stolen truck to him. The court dismissed the application, deeming custodial interrogation necessary as the truck remained unrecovered.

What did the court decide?

Exemption allowed subject to exceptions; Anticipatory Bail Application dismissed.

Jatinder Singh Vs the State Govt of NCT Delhi — Property and Title | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~69

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 3240/2024 JATINDER SINGH .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Ms. Niketa Vijay, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 06.09.2024

¶11

CRL.M.A. 26978/2024

¶12

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶13

Application stands disposed of.

¶14

BAIL APPLN. 3240/2024

¶15

An application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for grant of Anticipatory Bail in FIR No.14447/2024 under Section 379 IPC registered at P.S: Mundka.

¶16

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State appears on advance notice and accepts notice.

¶17

In brief, as per the case of prosecution, complainant was lured to hand over/park his truck, which was stolen and misappropriated by co-accused Sunil and Iftakhar who were subsequently arrested in another case. It is further the case of prosecution that the truck is yet to be recovered.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that efforts were made by petitioner to join the investigation but he could not meet the Investigating Officer. He further submits that petitioner has no knowledge about the truck.

¶19

BAIL APPLN. 3240/2024 Page 1 of 2

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:12:23

¶21

On the other hand, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the application and submits that since truck in question is yet to be recovered, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is necessary.

¶22

The custodial interrogation of the petitioner cannot be ruled out since the truck is yet to be recovered and the same is disclosed to have been handed over by co-accused Sunil to the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances and evidence on record, no grounds for anticipatory bail are made out.

¶23

Application is accordingly dismissed. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶24

A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information and compliance.

¶25

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.

¶26

SEPTEMBER 6, 2024/ PU

¶27

BAIL APPLN. 3240/2024 Page 2 of 2

¶28

Jatinder Singh v. the State Govt of NCT Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jatinder Singh v. the State Govt of NCT Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Tharun Vac & Ors. Vs Lalit Mohan Tiwari

Mrs.Malti Gupta Vs State NCT of Delhi through SHO of Police Ps-South Campus & Anr. & Anr.

Sh Dharampal Jain Vs State of Delhi

Hairan @ Kaleem Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Shailender Vs State NCT of Delhi

Vinod Kumar Aggarwal Vs State of NCT of Delhi