Disposed

Mrs.Malti Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi through SHO of Police Ps-South Campus & Anr. & Anr.

Delhi HC5 Sept 2024CRL.M.C./6634/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR. The Court held intervention was preposterous at the initial investigation stage and disposed of the petition after it was withdrawn by the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR disposed of after withdrawal by the petitioner.

Mrs.Malti Gupta Vs State NCT of Delhi through SHO of Police… — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~36

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 6634/2024

¶4

MRS.MALTI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ayush Yadav and Mr. Suresh Gupta, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO OF POLICE PS-SOUTH CAMPUS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Yashpal, PS: South Campus.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R

¶9

% 05.09.2024

¶10

CRL.M.A. 25344/2024

¶11

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶12

Application stands disposed of.

¶13

CRL.M.C. 6634/2024

¶14

1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 101/2024, under Sections 323/448/34 IPC, registered at PS: South Campus.

¶15

2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State appears on advance notice and accepts notice.

¶16

3. Learned APP for the State, on instructions of IO, submits that the FIR was registered on 08.06.2024 and the case is at initial stage of investigation. Further, petitioner is stated to have been admitted to anticipatory bail since the offences are bailable.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:35:17

¶18

4. This Court is of the considered opinion that since the case is at initial stage of investigation, it may be preposterous to intervene in the proceedings at this juncture, since the investigation / final report is yet to be concluded. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner. 6. Taking the statement of learned counsel for petitioner on record, petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶19

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.

¶20

SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 / R

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:35:17

Mrs.Malti Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi through SHO of Police Ps-South Campus & Anr. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.Malti Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi through SHO of Police Ps-South Campus & Anr. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagwan Das Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Amit Bhatia Vs State of NCT Delhi

Mr. Sukhpreet @ Bunty @ Kanha Vs the State(Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Mr. X Vs Director General of Prisons

Sh. Amit Kumar & Ors. Vs the State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Amin Ur Rehman Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi