Petitioner sought to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition without prejudice to rights. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
SH DHARAMPAL JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rachit Gupta, Proxy Counsel.
versus
STATE OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with SI Aman Kumar, PS: Delhi Cantt.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R
% 05.09.2024
Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions of petitioner, seeks to withdraw the petition without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner.
Taking the statement of learned counsel for petitioner on record, petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 / R
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:36:15
SH Dharampal Jain
STATE OF DELHI
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
