Allowed

Rahul v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC7 Feb 2024BAIL APPLN./1812/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge order in a bail application under Section 438 CrPC. The petitioner joined the investigation as directed, and the complainant (his wife) raised no objection to bail being fully confirmed. Bail granted subject to a personal and surety bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and a surety bond of Rs. 25,000, subject to joining the investigation.

Rahul Vs State (Nct of Delhi) — Anticipatory Bail | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1812/2023

¶4

RAHUL ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent

¶8

Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with complainant in person.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶11

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 CrP.C. seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 53/23 under Sections 365/511/506/34 IPC & 27 Arms Act registered at P.S. Mansarovar Park.

¶12

Vide order dated 26.05.2023, notice was issued and it was directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested subject to his joining investigation. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined investigation as and when he was called for, which position is not disputed by the learned APP for the State, on instructions from the IO, who is present in Court.

¶13

The complainant is also present in Court, who has been identified by the IO concerned. The complainant submits that she got married to the present petitioner on 03.07.2023 and she has no objection in case the interim

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:25:12

¶16

bail granted to the petitioner is confirmed.

¶17

In view of the above, it is directed that in the event of petitioner being arrested, he be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- and a surety bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer / Arresting Officer, further subject to the condition that he will join investigation as and when directed by the Investigating Officer concerned.

¶18

The petition alongwith pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶19

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

¶20

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶21

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶22

FEBRUARY 7, 2024 N.S. ASWAL

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:25:12

Rahul v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Kumar Surolia & Ors. Vs the State & Anr.

Chetan Diwakar & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Bhupinder Kumar Arora Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Jitender Bidhuri Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Smt. Rajwanti Malik & Ors. Vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.

Mohd Nasar Vs Narcotics Control Bureau & Anr.