Allowed

Jitender Bidhuri v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC7 Feb 2024BAIL APPLN./157/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Vikas Mahajan granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in an FIR alleging culpable homicide, subject to furnishing personal and surety bonds of Rs. 10,000 each and joining the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- and surety bond of Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer and joining the investigation as directed.

Jitender Bidhuri Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 157/2024

¶4

JITENDER BIDHURI ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Jitender Tyagi, Mr. Rajesh Pandey and Mr. Gaurav Bidhuri, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent

¶8

Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶11

CRL.M.A. 1251/2024 (exemption)

¶12

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

Application stands disposed of.

¶14

BAIL APPLN. 157/2024

¶15

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 744/2023 under Sections 307/34 IPC registered at PS Govindpuri.

¶16

The case of the prosecution is that a scuffle between complainant’s father and his two neighbours occurred during a marriage function, which was resolved peacefully. On 05.12.2023, co-accused Narendra went to the complainant’s house and started breaking the gate of his house with stones and kicks. On protest, the co-accused stabbed the complainant with a knife

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:25:13

¶18

on his back. This led to the registration of aforesaid FIR.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no overt act has been alleged against the present petitioner. He further submits that the injuries suffered by the petitioner were not grievous and he was discharged on the same day.

¶20

On a query posed by the Court, the learned APP, on instructions from the Investigating Officer who is present in Court, affirms the position that the complainant / victim was discharged on the same day.

¶21

In view of the above, it is directed that in the event of petitioner being arrested, he be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- and a surety bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer / Arresting Officer, further subject to the condition that he will join investigation as and when directed by the Investigating Officer concerned.

¶22

The petition alongwith pending application stand disposed of.

¶23

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

¶24

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶25

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶26

FEBRUARY 7, 2024/ N.S. ASWAL

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:25:13

Jitender Bidhuri v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitender Bidhuri v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Kumar Surolia & Ors. Vs the State & Anr.

Chetan Diwakar & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Bhupinder Kumar Arora Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Smt. Rajwanti Malik & Ors. Vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.

Mohd Nasar Vs Narcotics Control Bureau & Anr.

Rahul Vs State (Nct of Delhi)