Allowed

Vikash Kumar Surolia & Ors. v. the State & Anr.

Delhi HC6 Feb 2024CRL.M.C./927/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a petition under Section 482 CrPC quashing an FIR registered under Sections 498A and 406 IPC. The parties had reached a settlement, dissolved their marriage by mutual consent, and the settlement amount was fully paid, leading to the quashing of proceedings in the interest of justice.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.0862/2020 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all consequential proceedings are quashed.

Vikash Kumar Surolia & Ors. Vs the State & Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~47

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 927/2024

¶4

VIKASH KUMAR SUROLIA & ORS. ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through: Ms Bhakti Pasrija, Mr Moksh Pasrija and Mr Vikas Saini, Advocates along with petitioners in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Priya, Police Station Sagarpur. Mr Mukesh Sharma, Advocate for R- 2 along with R-2 in person.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶9

O R D E R % 06.02.2024

¶10

CRL.M.A. 3727/2024

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 927/2024 & CRL.M.A. 3726/2024

¶12

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No.0862/2020 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Sagarpur, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the ground that the parties have arrived at a settlement.

¶13

Issue notice. The learned APP for the State accepts notice. He submits that since the FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute and the parties

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:29:16

¶16

have arrived at a settlement, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

¶17

The petitioner no.1 (former husband) has joined through video conferencing whereas the petitioner nos.2 to 5, who are close relatives of the petitioner no.1 are present in the Court. Respondent no.2 (former wife) is also present in the Court and they have been identified by their respective counsel and by the Investigating Officer SI Priya, Police Station Sagarpur.

¶18

The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 04.12.2017 according to Hindu Rites and Customs. No child was born out of the said wedlock. 6. On account of temperamental issues certain disputes arose between the parties and they started living separately w.e.f. 26.10.2019. The dispute between the parties also led to the registration of present FIR. 7. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have arrived at a settlement, terms whereof were reduced in writing in the form of Settlement dated 09.12.2023, which is annexed as Annexure-P/6 to the present petition. 8. In terms of the said settlement, the parties decided to dissolve their marriage by filing a petition for divorce by way of mutual consent. Accordingly, the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have obtained a decree of divorce dated 20.12.2023, which is annexed as Annexure-P/7 (Colly.) to the present petition.

¶19

It is a term of the settlement between the parties that the petitioner no.1 shall pay a total sum of Rs.18,00,000/- to the respondent no.2 towards full and final settlement of all her claims on account of streedhan , permanent alimony, dowry articles, maintenance (past, present and future) etc. Out of the said amount, a sum of Rs.12,00,000/- has already been paid

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:29:16

¶22

by the petitioner no.1 to the respondent no.2 in the manner as mentioned in the settlement. The remaining amount of Rs.6,00,000/- has been paid to the respondent no.2 today in the court by the petitioner no.1 by way of Demand Draft bearing No.465642 dated 21.12.2023 issued by YES Bank Ltd.

¶23

The receipt of entire amount of Rs.18,00,000/- is acknowledged by the respondent no.2, who is present in court.

¶24

The respondent no.2, on a query put by the Court, states that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed.

¶25

In view of the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement, no useful purpose will be served in continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them.

¶26

It is, thus, in the interest of justice that the present FIR and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom be quashed.

¶27

Consequently, the petition is allowed and the FIR No.0862/2020 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Sagarpur, Delhi alongwith all other proceedings emanating therefrom, is quashed.

¶28

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

¶29

Order be uploaded on the website of this court.

¶30

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶31

FEBRUARY 6, 2024 MK

¶32

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:29:16

Vikash Kumar Surolia & Ors. v. the State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Kumar Surolia & Ors. v. the State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Kishan @ Bablu Vs State Gnct of Delhi and Anr.

Mohit Vs State of NCT and Delhi & Anr.

Sonu Banjara Vs NCT of Delhi

Chetan Diwakar & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Bhupinder Kumar Arora Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Inder Pal Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors.