The single judge permitted the petitioner to withdraw the arbitration petition. The arbitration petition along with the pending application was dismissed as withdrawn, with no merit adjudicated.
Petition and pending application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Mr. Vanshay Kaul, Advs.
versus
OVERSEAS COURIER SERVICES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Juneja, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
During the arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the submissions made, the present petition along with pending application stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is made clear that this court has not gone into the merits of the case and the withdrawal of the present petition will not prejudice the proceedings before the learned Arbitrator.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 21, 2024/AR..
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/02/2024 at 15:12:47
Anupam Gupta
Overseas Courier Services (India) Private Limited
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
