Disposed

Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. v. Rishabh Aggarwal.

Delhi HC28 Aug 2024ARB.P./856/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appearing under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, this Court referred the disputes under an agreement dated 28.12.2022 to arbitration under the aegis of DIAC on the consent of both parties, deferring the reference for three months to facilitate settlement.

What did the court decide?

The disputes are referred to DIAC for appointment of an arbitrator. The reference is deferred for three months to enable settlement.

Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. Vs Rishabh Aggarwal. — Specific Performance | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 856/2024

¶4

KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Sen, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

RISHABH AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Newani, Advocate.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R % 28.08.2024

¶9

The petitioner has approached this Court under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”], for appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties under an agreement dated 28.12.2022 [“the Agreement”], by which the petitioner financed the purchase of a car by the respondent.

¶10

The agreement contains an arbitration clause [Clause 32], which provides for adjudication of disputes by a sole arbitrator to be appointed by the petitioner. Schedule I to the Agreement provides for arbitration to be held in Delhi.

¶11

Disputes having arisen between the parties, the petitioner invoked arbitration by a letter dated 11.03.2024, to which there was no response. It has therefore filed this petition under Section 11 of the Act.

¶12

Mr. Ashok Kumar Newani, learned counsel, has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent, pursuant to notice issued on 01.07.2024.

¶13

ARB.P. 856/2024

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/08/2024 at 12:49:52

¶16

Mr. Newani states that the respondent has defaulted in making four instalment payments on account of an accident, and wishes to regularise his account. Mr. Newani, however, does not dispute the existence of an arbitration agreement.

¶17

Learned counsel for the parties are agreeable to a reference to arbitration, with a request to defer the reference for a period of three months to enable the parties to settle their disputes. 7. In view of the aforesaid submissions, and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the disputes under the agreement dated 28.12.2022 are referred to arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Shershah Road, New Delhi [“DIAC”]. DIAC is requested to nominate an arbitrator from its panel. The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration under Section 12 of the Act, prior to entering upon the reference.

¶18

The arbitration proceedings will be governed by the Rules of DIAC, including as to remuneration of the learned Arbitrator. 9. DIAC is requested to defer the reference for a period of three months from today to enable the parties to settle their disputes. In the event either party approaches DIAC after a period of three months, DIAC will enter into the reference upon a request of the parties. 10. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open for adjudication by the learned Arbitrator. 11. The petition stands disposed of in these terms.

¶19

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶20

AUGUST 28, 2024// “ Bhupi ”/

¶21

ARB.P. 856/2024

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. v. Rishabh Aggarwal.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. v. Rishabh Aggarwal.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms Vishal Nirmiti Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Aakash Educational Services Limited Vs Sudhanshu Kumar

M/S Satya Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Delhi Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.

Cln Energy Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Jlnphenix Energy Pvt. Ltd.) Vs Duak Energy Private Limited

M/S Travancore Management Resources Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S H.B Estate Developers Ltd.

Ram Dhari Ram Phal Vs Virender Singh Yadav