The petition, along with all pending applications, was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive legal proposition was laid down as the matter was disposed of via withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
MS VISHAL NIRMITI PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sweta Rani, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Dr. B Ramaswamy, CGSC with Ms. Archana Kumari, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 27.08.2024
At the request of Ms. Sweta Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition, alongwith all pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
AUGUST 27, 2024 ‘Bhupi’/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2024 at 12:29:40
MS VISHAL NIRMITI PVT LTD
UNION OF INDIA
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
