The pettion was allowed and the mandate of the arbitral tribunal was extended unconditionally to 27.08.2025 upon consent of both parties to the construction dispute.
Extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal to 27.08.2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
M/S SATYA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kaadambari Singh, Ms. Muskaan Chawla and Mr. Ashish, Advocates.
versus
M/S DELHI BUILDTECH PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R
PRATEEK JALAN, J
AUGUST 27, 2024/ SS/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2024 at 12:30:08
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Satya Developers Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Delhi Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
