Disposed

Radico Khaitan Limited v. Gfs Financial Solution Private Limited

Delhi HC16 May 2024ARB.P./367/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 11 petition for appointment of an arbitrator over invoice-based arbitration clause. Both parties consented to mediation followed by arbitration; the court referred the parties to Samadhan mediation, with DIAC arbitration as fallback if mediation failed.

What the court decided

AI extract

Radico Khaitan Limited Vs Gfs Financial Solution Private Limited — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~5

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 367/2024

¶4

RADICO KHAITAN LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamal Garg, Advocate. [M:9811270502]

¶5

versus

¶6

GFS FINANCIAL SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nitin K. Gupta, Ms. Ritika Gautam & Mr. Ayush Tripathi, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 16.05.2024

¶10

By way of this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”], the petitioner seeks adjudication of disputes by an arbitrator. The arbitration agreement is contained in clause 5 of the invoices raised by the petitioner upon the respondent.

¶11

The petitioner claims to have invoked arbitration by a communication dated 02.11.2023, but has pleaded that the communication was returned unserved.

¶12

Mr. Nitin K. Gupta, learned counsel, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and disputes the petitioner’s contention with regard to the service of the invocation notice. However, the respondent is agreeable to adjudication of the disputes by arbitration of an independent arbitrator,

¶13

ARB.P. 367/2024

¶14

Page 1 of 3

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2024 at 11:28:04

¶16

reserving all rights and contentions of the parties on merits. Mr. Gupta also suggests that having regard to the fact that claim in this case is relatively small, the parties may be referred to mediation to resolve their disputes. Mr. Kamal Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner, is also agreeable to the same.

¶17

Having regard to the above, and with consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is disposed of with the following directions: -

¶18

A. The parties are referred to mediation under the aegis of Samadhan, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Shershah Road, New Delhi-110503 [“Samadhan”].

¶19

B. They will appear before the learned Mediator on 24.05.2024.

¶20

C. In the event the mediation proceedings are unsuccessful, disputes between the parties will be adjudicated by arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Shershah Road, New Delhi [“DIAC”]. DIAC is requested to nominate an arbitrator from its panel.

¶21

D. The arbitration proceedings will be governed by the Rules of DIAC, including as to remuneration of the learned Arbitrator.

¶22

E. The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration under Section 12 of the Act, prior to entering upon the reference.

¶23

F. DIAC is requested to defer the arbitral proceedings for a period of eight weeks from today, to enable the parties to resolve their disputes through mediation. If the parties are unable to settle their disputes in the meantime, either party may approach DIAC to enter into the reference thereafter.

¶24

It is made clear that all rights and contentions of the parties are left

ARB.P. 367/2024

Page 2 of 3

open for adjudication by the learned Arbitrator.

¶29

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶30

MAY 16, 2024 ‘pv’/

¶31

ARB.P. 367/2024

¶32

Page 3 of 3

¶33

Radico Khaitan Limited v. Gfs Financial Solution Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Radico Khaitan Limited v. Gfs Financial Solution Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Promax Power Ltd. Vs Tahal Consulting Engineers (I) Pvt. Ltd.

Union of India Vs Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited

Suved Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Holystar Industries & Anr.

Hero Motocorp Limited Vs Spectra Auto & Ors.

Radico Khaitan Limited Vs Amit Infotech Private Limited

Radico Khaitan Limited Vs Katyal Enterprises Private Limited