Disposed

M/S Odwen Technologies Private Limited v. M/S Forte Furniture Products India Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC16 Feb 2024ARB.P./1217/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act sought appointment of a sole arbitrator for disputes under a Warehouse Services Agreement containing an arbitration clause. Both parties consented; the court referred disputes to Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja as arbitrator under DIAC aegis and disposed of the petition, leaving all rights and contentions open.

What the court decided

AI extract

M/S Odwen Technologies Private Limited Vs M/S Forte Furniture… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 1217/2023

¶4

M/S ODWEN TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED.... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. (VC).

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S FORTE FURNITURE PRODUCTS INDIA PVT. LTD

¶8

..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Brinda Batra, Advs.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

¶11

O R D E R % 16.02.2024

¶12

I.A. 23010/2023

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application.

¶14

In view of the submissions made, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶15

ARB.P. 1217/2023

¶16

By way of the present petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘A&C Act’ ), the petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶17

Learned counsel submits that he has filed the reply yesterday. However, the reply is not on record.

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:39:49

¶20

Let the reply be brought on record.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties had entered into a Warehouse Services Agreement dated 10.08.2021. It is submitted that the said Warehouse Services Agreement contains an arbitration clause (Clause-13), which provides that all disputes, with respect to the said agreement, shall be referred to arbitration as per provisions of the A&C Act, and further provides that the place of arbitration would be at Delhi.

¶22

Disputes having arisen between the parties, the petitioner invoked arbitration vide notice dated 23.04.2023.

¶23

Learned counsel submits that the claim amount is around Rupees Nineteen Lacs.

¶24

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent, on instructions, submits that the answering respondent has no objection to the matter being referred to the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator.

¶25

Considering that both the parties have consented to the reference to the arbitral tribunal, the present petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶26

i) The disputes between the parties under the said agreement are referred to the arbitral tribunal.

¶27

ii) As agreed by both the counsels for the parties, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate (Mobile No. 9810147798) is appointed as an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶28

iii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi hereinafter, referred to as the ‘DIAC’). The

¶29

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:39:49

¶30

remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of fee rules of the DIAC Schedule or as the parties may agree.

¶31

iv) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference.

¶32

v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims on merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

¶33

vi) The parties shall approach the learned arbitrator within two weeks from today.

¶34

The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶35

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

¶36

FEBRUARY 16, 2024/AR..

¶37

This is a digitally signed order.

¶38

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:39:49

M/S Odwen Technologies Private Limited v. M/S Forte Furniture Products India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M/S Odwen Technologies Private Limited v. M/S Forte Furniture Products India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union of India Vs M/s. Jay Prestressed Products Ltd.

Airport Authority of India Vs M/S Sms Limited

Chabbras Associates Vs M/S Hscc (India) Ltd. & Anr.

Easy Trip Planners Limited Vs C K Birla Corporate Service Limited & Anr.

Agilus Diagnostics Limited Vs Rama Medical Store & Anr.

Ghulam Rasool Vs Daryaganj Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.