Disposed

Neha Agarwal v. Canara Bank

Delhi HC18 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/9968/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, an employee of the Bank facing a Delhi transfer, withdrew the resignation-related relief and sought liberty to make a representation for compassionate transfer back to Delhi. The writ petition was disposed of with the Competent Authority to consider the representation independently.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to petitioner to make a representation for compassionate transfer back to Delhi; Bank to consider it.

Neha Agarwal Vs Canara Bank — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~51

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 9968/2024 and CM APPL. Nos. 40834/2024 and 54681/2024

¶4

NEHA AGARWAL .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Sameer Bhatnagar and Mr. Yogender Kumar, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

CANARA BANK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shubham Saigal and Mr. Siddharth Jain, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 18.09.2024

¶12

At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner on instructions does not press the relief with respect to resignation. He however, submits that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the Bank against her transfer considering that the Petitioner has some personal problems including the fact that she is planning a family and needs to be back to Delhi. It is also stated that the Petitioner will not be averse to transfer to any other branch of the Bank in Delhi.

¶13

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioner to make a representation to the Respondent to consider transferring her back to Delhi, may be to another Branch of the Bank, on compassionate grounds. As and when the representation is received, the same shall be considered by the Competent Authority of the Respondent looking to the compassionate grounds set forth by the Petitioner with an independent mind.

¶14

W.P.(C) 9968/2024 Page 1 of 2

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:02:40

¶17

Pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶18

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶19

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024/ jg

¶20

W.P.(C) 9968/2024 Page 2 of 2

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:02:40

Neha Agarwal v. Canara Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neha Agarwal v. Canara Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Rana Tabassum Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Saurabh Gupta Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 7(1), New Delhi & Ors.

Management of Dtc Vs Karan Singh

Sanjeev Mehta Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

General Secretary, Cel Retired Employees Welfare Association (Celrewa) Vs Central Electronics Limited & Anr.

Soni Ghosh and Ors. Vs Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Developemt Corporation and Ors.

15766989A, Ex. Hav (Gnr) Jatin Sharma Vs the Central Information Commission & Ors.

Jung Bahadur Singh and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sujoy Kumar Makar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Anwar Kamal Vs Ministry of Human Resource Dev

Prasanna Kumari Vs Union of India and Ors.

M.P. Kanth Vs Indian Council of Historical Research & Ors.

Dinesh Chand Sharma Vs Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School & Anr.

Manish Sahu Vs Union of India & Anr.