Dismissed

Sujoy Kumar Makar v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC17 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/12979/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition regarding the petitioner's appointment in an education institution. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The court allowed the withdrawal and discharged all pending applications.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; Case permissions disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate forum.

Sujoy Kumar Makar Vs Union of India & Ors. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~104

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 12979/2024

¶4

SUJOY KUMAR MAKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Raj Mohanty, Ms. Payal Mohanty, Ms. Yogita Sharma and Mr. Tarunveer Singh, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Yash Tyagi, Govt. Pleader and Ms. Kalpana Jha, Advocate for R-1/UOI.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 17.09.2024 CM APPL. 54100/2024

¶11

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

Application stands disposed of.

¶13

W.P.(C) 12979/2024 & CM APPL. Nos. 54098-99/2024

¶14

This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the Petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs:

¶15

“(i) issue rule nisi to the Respondents;

¶16

(ii) quash and set aside the impugned Letter dated 31.07.2024 [Annexure: P-1], whereby the Applications of the Petitioner the Post of Lecturer (Audiology/Speech Language Pathology) and Reader (Audiology) as being bad and non-est in law;

¶17

(iii) direct the Respondents to grant relaxation to the Applicant for enabling him to participate in the Selection to the Post of Reader (Audiology) and/or Lecturer (Audiology/Speech Language Pathology) and appoint the Applicant to such post as he may be found fit for;

¶18

W.P.(C) 12979/2024

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:54:48

¶20

page 2 of 2

¶21

W.P.(C) 12979/2024

¶22

(iv) grant all consequential benefits thereto to the Petitioner in accordance with law;

¶23

(v) allow exemplary costs of the present Writ Petition to the Petitioner against the Respondents”

¶24

Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the present petition as this Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain this writ petition, with liberty to approach appropriate forum.

¶25

Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶26

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶27

SEPTEMBER 17, 2024

¶28

¶29

Sujoy Kumar Makar v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujoy Kumar Makar v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagender Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sachin Kumar Bhati & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Navneet Kumar Pandey Vs Union of India & Ors.

Anwar Ali Vs All India Football Federation & Ors.

Ikramuddin Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

M.P. Kanth Vs Indian Council of Historical Research & Ors.

Devinder Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Krishna Devi Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Sachin Kumar Bhati & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Navneet Kumar Pandey Vs Union of India & Ors.

Dr Sana Tasleem Vs University of Delhi & Ors.

Ram Kunal Vs B.S.E.S.Rajdhani Power Ltd.

All India Retired Bank Employees Association Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sher Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.