Disposed

Sanjeev Mehta v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC17 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/3998/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of the writ petition seeking mandamus against unauthorized construction. The MCD directed to adhere to its Status Report and complete the action within four months. Liberty granted to approach STF if grievances remain unredressed.

What did the court decide?

MCD to abide by Status Report and take issue to logical end within four months; Liberty to approach STF.

Sanjeev Mehta Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~66

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 3998/2024 & CM APPL. 29632/2024 SANJEEV MEHTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Shailendra Kumar, Adv.

¶4

versus

¶5

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Umesh K.Burnwal, SC for MCD with Mr. Harish Adhikari, Adv. Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Saksham, Adv for Delhi Police.

¶6

Mr. Kapil Dua and Ms. Vandana Anand, Adv for R-3.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 17.09.2024

¶9

The petitioner in the instant writ petition has prayed for the following

¶10

reliefs:-

¶11

" I) writ, order or directions in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents no. 1 & 2 to initiate appropriate lawful action against the unauthorized construction raised by Respondent No. 3; II) award the cost of the present Writ Petition in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondents;

¶12

III) pass any other or further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

¶13

In paragraphs no. 6 to 9 of the Status Report filed by respondent-

¶14

MCD, following stand has been taken:-

¶15

"6. It is further submitted that as per record the unauthorized construction in the shape of two rooms and stair case at the roof slab of ground floor of flat no. N-26/A-3, Janta Flats, Dilshad Garden was booked vide file no. 42/B-I/UC/SH-N/2021 dated 15/02/2021. The show cause notice under section 343 & 344 (1) of DMC Act, 1957 vide No. 15422 dated 15.02.2021 followed by demolition notice vide no. 18866

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:34:25

¶17

dated 02.03.2021 were issued and served to owner/Dr. Rajeev Narula. After non compliance of the above said notices demolition orders were passed on 16/03/2021 after following due process of law.

¶18

7. That the demolition action programme was fixed on 06.07.2022, 11.07.2022 and 25.07.2023 but action could not be taken due to nonavailability of police force. A vacation notice U/s 349 of DMC Act dated 22.09.2023 was issued to the owner/occupier under the copy of SHO PS Seemapuri with request to get the premises vacated as the same is found occupied. Further demolition action programme was fixed on 26.09.2023 and demolition action was taken during the course of action one panel of RCC slab at roof of the first floor was demolished and reinforcement bar cut by gas cutter (photographs during demolition are placed at Annexure R-1 in colly).

¶19

8. It is further submitted that the flat no. N-26/A-2, Janta Flat, Dilshad Garden, Delhi has been inspected by the area JE (B) on 15.05.2024 and during the inspection it has been noticed that it is a ground floor DDA land. At the time of inspection no ongoing construction found at site. It is further submitted that deviation/excess coverage against the standard building plan is exist at suit property which is old and occupied. (photograph is enclosed herewith as Annexure R-2).

¶20

9. It is submitted that a letter dated 22.04.2024 has been received from Addl. DCP-II, Shahdara District regarding not providing police force during the General Election of Lok Sabha 2024, hence further action will be taken after General Election of Lok Sabha 2024 as per availability of police force (copy of letter is enclosed herewith as Annexure R-3)."

¶21

The respondent-MCD is directed to abide by the stand taken in the Status Report and is further directed to take the issue to its logical end within a period of four months from today.

¶22

The petitioner is granted liberty to approach the Special Task Force (STF), in case, he is of the opinion that the respondent-MCD has not redressed the grievance of the petitioner.

¶23

With the aforesaid observation, nothing more is required to be adjudicated and the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶25

SEPTEMBER 17, 2024/MJ

¶26

Sanjeev Mehta v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Mehta v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagender Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sachin Kumar Bhati & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Navneet Kumar Pandey Vs Union of India & Ors.

Anwar Ali Vs All India Football Federation & Ors.

Ikramuddin Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

M.P. Kanth Vs Indian Council of Historical Research & Ors.

Devinder Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Krishna Devi Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Suresh Kumar Jain and Ors. Vs NTPC Limited and Ors.

Paramount Communications Limited Vs Northern Railways & Anr.

Sarika Sharma Vs Bses Yamuna Power Limited & Anr.

Devanand Vs Khem Raj & Anr.

Dinesh Pawar Vs Harpal Singh Tomar & Anr.

Smt Omwati Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.