Petitioners withdrew the writ petition after arguments, seeking liberty to pursue appropriate legal proceedings; the court disposed of the petition with all rights and contentions left open.
Liberty granted to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
ATAMJIT LAL MALHOTRA AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh and Ms. Punam Singh, Advocate
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashim Vachher, Advocate with Mr. Kunal Lakra, Mr. Vinayak Uniyal and Ms. Saiba M. Rajpal, Advocates for DDA.
Mr. Anupam Srivastava, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Sarita Pandey, Advocate for respondent No.2. Ms. Leena Tuteja and Ms. Ishita Kadyan, Advocate for respondent No.3.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R
%
18.07.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JULY 18, 2024/ js
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:12:26
Atamjit Lal Malhotra and Anr
Delhi Development Authority
Acting Chief Justice
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
