Writ petition by an ex-inspector general duty concerning service matters. Counsel did not press the petition, opting instead to make a representation to the respondents. The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed, with the respondents directed to dispose of any representation within twelve weeks of receipt.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Krishna Kumar Sharma, SPC with Mr.Kautilya Birat, GP, Mr.Ravi Sharma & Mr.Aishwarya Gogna, Advs. Mr.Jitendra Kumar Mishra, HC, BSF.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR O R D E R % 19.07.2024
REKHA PALLI, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
JULY 19, 2024/ kk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 11:59:08
EX INSP GD Nanda Ballabh
Union of India
Rekha Palli
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
