Allowed

Suraj Kumar Pasi v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC19 Jul 2024W.P.(C)/9783/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This concise judgment disposed of a writ petition concerning pay revision. The Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding his pay within eight weeks, noting that revision would only be considered as a fall-out of a prior modified penalty order. Certiorari and mandamus prayers for quashing and pay fixation were effectively withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Direct the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation dated 07.03.2024 by passing a reasoned order within eight weeks, considering only pay revision resulting from the modified pena

Suraj Kumar Pasi Vs Union of India & Ors. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~43

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 9783/2024

¶4

SURAJ KUMAR PASI .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Adv. versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram, SPC with Mr. Hussain Taqvi and Mr. Ayushman Sharma, Advs. with Mr. Shiv Kumar Singh, SI and Mr. Rajesh Singh, Legal Officer, CRPF.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

¶9

% 19.07.2024

¶10

CM APPL. 40150/2024 (exemption)

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

The application stands disposed of.

¶13

W.P.(C) 9783/2024 .

¶14

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following

¶15

reliefs:-

¶16

“i. Issue a Writ of certiorari calling for the records and quash the impugned orders dated 20.04.2012 & 08.03.2021 passed by the Respondent No. 5 & 3.

¶17

ii. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the Respondents to fix the basic pay of Petitioner at par with his colleagues namely Head Constable/GD Gandhi Charan Jena.

¶18

iii. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the Respondents to decide the representation of Petitioner dated 07.03.2024.”

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 10:23:46

¶20

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the present the petitioner would be satisfied, if the respondents are directed to decide the petitioner’s pending representation dated 07.03.2024 by taking into account, the modified penalty order dated 08.03.2021 in a time bound manner.

¶21

Issue notice.

¶22

Mr. Aditya Vikram, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that though the petitioner’s request for modification of the penalty imposed on him cannot be re-considered now, the respondents will consider his prayer for revision of his pay, if any, as a result of the modified penalty order dated 08.03.2021.

¶23

In the light of this stand taken by the respondents, the petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 07.03.2024 by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks. It is however made clear that the respondents will be liable to consider only the petitioner’s prayer for revision/correction of his pay as a fall out of the modified penalty order dated 08.03.2021.

¶24

Needless to say, in case the petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the respondents, it will be open for the petitioner to seek legal recourse as permissible in law.

¶25

REKHA PALLI, J.

¶26

SHALINDER KAUR, J.

¶27

JULY 19, 2024/ SU

¶28

Suraj Kumar Pasi v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Kumar Pasi v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pervez Hayaatt Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Mufg Bank Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 2 (2)(1) & Ors.

A.K. Malik Vs State Bank of India & Ors.

Smt D Sandhya Vs Union of India & Ors.

Gauri Shanker Shukla & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ashwani Kapoor Legal Representative of Late Col Suraj Perkash Kapoor Vs Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

Anastasiia Pivtsaeva & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Ramshila Paramedical Technical College Private Iti Vs Directorate General of Training

Rakesh Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ct. Ankit Vs Union of India and Ors.

Commandant Jawahar Singh Negi Vs Union of India through Secretary & Ors.

Gyanendra Kumar Vs Union of India & Anr.

Ex Insp Gd Nanda Ballabh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sunil Yadav Vs Union of India and Ors.