Petitioner asserted that the matter between parties was settled. Court disposed of the writ petition without substantive adjudication in view of the settlement.
Writ petition disposed of as matter settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
RAFAT BEGUM .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kshitiz Mahipal, Mr. Khairun Nisa and Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advs.
versus
BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Moksh Arora and Mr.Santosh Ramdurg, Advs for BSES. Mr.M.S.Khan, Mr.M.Arshyan and Ms.Kekasha, Advs for R-2.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 08.08.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
AUGUST 8, 2024/MJ
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2024 at 11:40:37
Rafat Begum
BSES Yamuna Power Limited and Anr.
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
