The High Court of Delhi allowed a liberty to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings, citing a subsequent decision by the respondent, and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to take up fresh proceedings; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~43
Through: Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Mr. Puneet Sharma, Mr. Saurav Seth, Mr. Sourabh Luthra, Ms. Senjul Mehta, Advs.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms. Priya Singh, Mr. Nipun Jain, Advocates. Mr. Ankur Mishra, Adv.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 07.08.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
AUGUST 7, 2024/KG
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:46:07
CHANDER BHAN & ORS.
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
