The High Court of Delhi disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner informed the court that no stock was available, rendering the petition premature or unnecessary.
The present writ petition along with application is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
WINDLAS BIOTECH LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajeshwari Hariharan, Advocate with Mr.Tahir, AJ
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr.Sunil and Mr.Vedash Kumar, GP for UOI. Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Ms.Vidhi Jain, Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Mr.Rishi Kant Singh, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R % 13.05.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
MAY 13, 2024 AS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:57:48
WINDLAS BIOTECH LIMITED
UNION OF INDIA
ANR
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
