The petitioner sought to withdraw the pending writ petition. The High Court of Delhi disposed of the petition as withdrawn without any further merits analysis.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ 10
MEENAKSHI RAI BHATIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Ravi Kumar and Ms. Tannu Kumari, Advocates.
versus
ERNET INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Ralli, Senior Advocate with Mr. Chetanya Baweja, Mr. Shubham Yadav, Mr. Ravikant Yadav and Mr. Praful Nawani, Advocates for R1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 12.08.2024
JYOTI SINGH, J AUGUST 12, 2024/ jg
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2024 at 11:40:28
MEENAKSHI RAI BHATIA
ERNET INDIA
JYOTI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
