Lotan & Ors. v. MCD & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order in a writ petition; respondents granted four weeks to file reply to an application, rejoinder two weeks thereafter. Matter listed for further hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 8064/2010
LOTAN & ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Dhirendra Singh, Advocate. (M): 9811575181 9811575182 Email: [email protected]
versus
MCD & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC with Mr. Shivraj Singh Tomar, Advocates for respondent no. 1/MCD. (M): 9911991166 Email: [email protected] Mr. Shiven Varma, Panel Counsel GNCTD, for respondent no. 2. (M): 9810768282 Email: [email protected]
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 26.03.2025
- Learned counsels appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 2 put in appearance, and submit that they may be granted some time to file reply to CM APPL. 58665/2024 .
- Accordingly, let reply be filed by the respondents within a period of four weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within a period of two weeks, thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lotan & Ors
- respondent
MCD
- respondent
Respondent no. 2 (GNCTD)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court