Single judge order dismissing petitioner's writ petition for non-prosecution due to lack of appearance by petitioner and respondent through multiple dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
Through: None.
versus
THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Adv. for MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 12, 2024/DA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2024 at 12:24:08
VINOD KUMAR
THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
