Disposed

Shivraj Dahiya v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC17 May 2024W.P.(C)/7089/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of two identical writ petitions by directing respondents to consider the petitions as representations under the Supreme Court judgment in Director (Admn. And HR) KPTCL & Ors. versus C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. and to decide merits within ten weeks, with potential release of benefits in six weeks thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to treat the writ petitions as representations and decide merits within ten weeks.

Shivraj Dahiya Vs Union of India & Anr. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~53 & 68

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 7089/2024 & CM APPL. 29591/2024 SHIVRAJ DAHIYA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Kr. Tiwari and Mr. Anil Kr.Sinha,Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.K. Tyagi, SPC with Ms. Shobha Tyagi and Mr. Surinder Kumar, Advs. with Mr. Aakash Meena, Govt. Pleader with SI Prahlad Devendra and SI Amit Kumar for R1 and R2.

¶6

AND + W.P.(C) 7136/2024 & CM APPL. 29748/2024 DURGA PRASAD OJHA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Kr. Tiwari and Mr. Anil Kr.Sinha,Advs.

¶7

versus

¶8

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPC with Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, Govt. Pleader with Mr. Amit Sharma, Inspr. CISF and Mr. Prahlad, CISF.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶11

O R D E R % 17.05.2024

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/05/2024 at 11:52:01

¶14

CM APPL. 29591/2024 in W.P.(C) 7089/2024 CM APPL. 29748/2024 in W.P.(C) 7136/2024

¶15

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶16

Application stands disposed of.

¶17

W.P.(C) 7089/2024 W.P.(C) 7136/2024

¶18

As identical pleas have been made in these petitions in as much as the respondents should extend the benefit of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Director (Admn. And HR) KPTCL & Ors. versus C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. in Civil Appeal No. 2471/2023 decided on 11.04.2023, the same are decided by this common order.

¶19

Mr. Pramod Kr. Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners reiterates the prayers as sought in the writ petitions.

¶20

The counsel appear for the respondents state that each case is reqired to be looked/considered on facts to ensure that the said case is covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court.

¶21

Noting the said submission(s) made, we dispose of all these petitions with a direction to the respondents to consider the writ petitions as representations on behalf of the petitioners in terms of the judgement of the Supreme Court referred to above and dispose of the same within a period of ten weeks.

¶22

If the petitioners are entitled to the benefits as per the judgment of the Supreme Court, the same shall be released to them within a period of six weeks thereafter.

¶23

In the eventuality, the respondents are of the view that a petitioners are not entitled to the benefits as sought, reasons thereof, shall be communicated to the said petitioners in writing, and the petitioners shall be

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/05/2024 at 11:52:01

¶26

at liberty to seek such remedy as available in accordance of law.

¶27

The petitions stand disposed of.

¶28

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶29

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶30

MAY 17, 2024/ jg

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/05/2024 at 11:52:01

Shivraj Dahiya v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivraj Dahiya v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chuknoo Securities Limited through Its Director Sanjeev Agarwal Vs Dy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28 & Ors.

Chuknoo Securities Limited through Its Director Sanjeev Agarwal Vs Dy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28 & Ors.

Chuknoo Securities Limited through Its Director Sanjeev Agarwal Vs Dy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28 & Ors.

Chuknoo Securities Limited through Its Director Sanjeev Agarwal Vs Dy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28 Delhi & Ors.

Chhavi Vs University of Delhi

Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd. Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

Pankaj Sharma Vs Insurance Ombudsman and Anr.

Sks College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Ors.

Jeetu Ram Manjhi Vs Union Ofindia and Others

Vibha Gaur Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sarjeet Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Zole Sachin Madhav Vs Union of India & Ors.

Kuldeep Kumar Jat Vs Union of India & Ors.

Baldev Gujela, Vs Central Reserve Police Force and Ors.