The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a reply. Upon the counsel's submission to challenge the respondents' reply to a legal notice, the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to challenge the reply in accordance with law.
The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the reply in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
Through: Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Ruchir mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra and Mr. Saurabh Bhsuhan, Advocates for UOI.
Mr. Hilal Haider and Ms. Mehak Fatima, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
MAY 16, 2024 p
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/05/2024 at 11:51:21
VIBHA GAUR
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
V. KAMESWAR RAO
RAVINDER DUDEJA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
