Petition rendered infructuous as the exam result was declared and petitioner did not qualify. Petition disposed of with liberty to seek revival if respondent's statement is found incorrect.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
NIDHI PANDEY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Kripa Shankar, Adv.
versus
VASUDHA MISHRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ravinder Agarwal, Adv for UPSC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR O R D E R % 07.03.2024
REKHA PALLI, J
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
MARCH 7, 2024/ sr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 10:13:37
NIDHI PANDEY
VASUDHA MISHRA
REKHA PALLI
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
