Dismissed

Ashok Kumar Taneja v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC11 Mar 2024W.P.(C)/2349/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition concerning interim arrangements during pendency of an appeal before the ATMCD. As the appeal stood disposed of, the petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to appeal against the final ATMCD order before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karkardooma.

What did the court decide?

Petition withdrawn; liberty to file appeal before Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District, Karkardooma within 2 weeks with interim relief application; MCD not to take coercive steps for 2

Ashok Kumar Taneja Vs Municipal Corporation of… — Municipal and Town Planning | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~10

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2349/2024

¶4

ASHOK KUMAR TANEJA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Malhotra, Mr. Piyush Gupta, Mr. Karan Aggarwal, Mr. Shivam Kapoor, Mr. Karan Malhotra, Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta and Ms. Tanya Gupta, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC for MCD along with Mr. Manoviraj Singh and Mr. Manish Jain, Advs.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

¶9

O R D E R % 11.03.2024

¶10

During the course of hearing, respective counsel for the parties submit that Appeal No. 59/2024 filed by the petitioner before the ATMCD stands disposed of.

¶11

As such, no further order/s are required to be passed in the present petition inasmuch as the grievance raised in the present petition is as regards the interim arrangement that would subsist during the pendency of the aforesaid appeal.

¶12

In the circumstances, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedies against the final order passed by the ATMCD, by filing an appeal before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District, Karkardooma Courts. It is

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2024 at 11:51:14

¶14

submitted that the same would be filed latest within a within a period of 2 weeks from today, alongwith an application seeking interim relief.

¶15

Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. In the interregnum, learned counsel for the MCD submits, on instructions, that no coercive/ precipitative steps shall be taken for a period of 2 weeks from today.

¶16

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶17

MARCH 11, 2024/AT

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2024 at 11:51:14

Ashok Kumar Taneja v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar Taneja v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mangal Sain Sethi Vs Ndpl

Tafsir Ali Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Brajinder Singh Batra Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

Subnam Gupta Sabnam Gupta Vs Union of India

Shreekant Gupta Vs University of Delhi & Ors.

Mazhar Ali and Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Dushyant Poddar Vs Pr Commissioner of Income Tax DELHI-10 & Anr.

Kenisha Agrawal Minor Represented by Father and Natural Guardian Mr Nitin Agrawal Vs Union of India & Ors.

Tafsir Ali Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Amit Vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.

Arun Prabha Dube Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi South Zone & Anr.

Subhash Chander Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Smt. Geeta Rani and Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Rajinder Lal Arora Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.